Follow-up to the merged #166/#169. Addresses the second review pass (comment 1227): - footnoteWarnings plumbing: extract a single `footnoteWarningsField(markdown)` helper (footnote-analyze) and use it at all three call sites (create_page, update_page, import_page_markdown) so the field is attached identically. - New unit test footnote-warnings-import.test.mjs pins the contract that was uncovered: the field is present on problems / omitted on clean input, and the IMPORT path analyzes the BODY after the docmost:meta / docmost:comments blocks (a footnote-like token inside those JSON blocks must NOT warn; a real body marker must). Tested via the same pure composition the importer uses (footnoteWarningsField(parseDocmostMarkdown(full).body)) — no collab socket needed; a regression that analyzed fullMarkdown or skipped the body split would now go red. - footnote.marked.ts: correct the stale module header — it claimed "only definitions that have a matching reference are emitted", which was never true (orphan defs are emitted; the editor sync plugin reconciles). Now describes first-wins + reuse + sync reconciliation. - derive-id golden test: rename the describe from "(cross-package drift guard)" to "(deterministic-scheme pin)" — there is no second package to drift against. editor-ext 129, MCP 304 (+3), client+server tsc clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
116 KiB
116 KiB