fix(db): concurrent-pre-build индексов — переопределять f_unaccent ПЕРЕД циклом

Ревью #516: фича была мёртвой-при-рождении ровно на целевом кейсе. Все три
CONCURRENT_INDEXES используют LOWER(f_unaccent(col)), но index-инлайнящаяся
1-арг форма f_unaccent (SELECT public.unaccent($1)) создаётся ВНУТРИ миграции
20260705, а ensureConcurrentIndexes зовётся ПЕРЕД мигратором. На существующем
тенанте живой f_unaccent — ещё старая 2-арг форма из 20250729, которая НЕ
инлайнится: CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY падает («function unaccent(unknown, text)
does not exist … during inlining»), best-effort глотает, и мигратор строит
индексы НЕ-concurrently под тем самым SHARE-локом (эмпирически подтверждено
ревьюером на живом pg).

Фикс: перед циклом идемпотентно переопределяем f_unaccent в 1-арг форму
(output-identical, в lockstep с 20260705), в том же best-effort try/swallow.

Плюс честный докстринг: убрал ложное «worst case = previous behaviour».
Прерванный CONCURRENTLY оставляет INVALID-индекс, который name-based IF NOT
EXISTS не чинит — новый режим отказа (старый in-tx build такого не оставлял).

Тест: переопределялка вызывается ПЕРВОЙ (order), затем индексы CONCURRENTLY вне
транзакции; провал переопределялки не рвёт цикл. Mutation-verify: убрать
pre-loop redef → order-тест краснеет.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-12 00:37:07 +03:00
parent 4109b2ef7f
commit f919ced8c9
2 changed files with 103 additions and 20 deletions
@@ -20,13 +20,20 @@ describe('ensureConcurrentIndexes', () => {
rawMock.mockClear();
});
it('runs every registered index CONCURRENTLY, IF NOT EXISTS, outside a transaction', async () => {
it('redefines the inlinable f_unaccent BEFORE building any index, then builds each CONCURRENTLY outside a transaction', async () => {
const onLog = jest.fn();
await ensureConcurrentIndexes(fakeDb, onLog);
expect(rawMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(CONCURRENT_INDEXES.length);
for (const call of rawMock.mock.calls) {
const stmt = call[0] as string;
// One f_unaccent redefine + one statement per index.
expect(rawMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(CONCURRENT_INDEXES.length + 1);
const statements = rawMock.mock.calls.map((c) => c[0] as string);
// ORDER: the f_unaccent redefine MUST be first — otherwise an existing
// tenant's old 2-arg f_unaccent makes every CONCURRENTLY build fail.
expect(statements[0]).toContain('CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f_unaccent');
expect(statements[0]).toContain('SELECT public.unaccent($1)');
expect(statements[0]).not.toContain('CREATE INDEX');
// The rest are the CONCURRENTLY index builds.
for (const stmt of statements.slice(1)) {
expect(stmt).toContain('CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY');
expect(stmt).toContain('IF NOT EXISTS');
}
@@ -34,12 +41,31 @@ describe('ensureConcurrentIndexes', () => {
for (const call of execMock.mock.calls) {
expect(call[0]).toBe(fakeDb);
}
expect(onLog).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(CONCURRENT_INDEXES.length);
expect(onLog).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(CONCURRENT_INDEXES.length + 1);
});
it('still builds the indexes when the f_unaccent redefine fails (fresh DB, best-effort)', async () => {
// Redefine (first execute) throws; the index loop must still run.
execMock
.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('extension "unaccent" does not exist'))
.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
const onLog = jest.fn();
await expect(
ensureConcurrentIndexes(fakeDb, onLog),
).resolves.toBeUndefined();
// 1 redefine attempt + one per index.
expect(execMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(CONCURRENT_INDEXES.length + 1);
const errored = onLog.mock.calls.filter((c) => c[1] !== undefined);
expect(errored).toHaveLength(1);
expect(String(errored[0][1])).toContain('unaccent');
});
it('is best-effort: a failing index does not abort the rest and is reported', async () => {
// Fail the FIRST index; the remaining ones must still be attempted.
// Redefine ok; fail the FIRST index; the remaining ones must still be tried.
execMock
.mockResolvedValueOnce(undefined) // f_unaccent redefine
.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('relation "pages" does not exist'))
.mockResolvedValue(undefined);
const onLog = jest.fn();
@@ -48,8 +74,7 @@ describe('ensureConcurrentIndexes', () => {
ensureConcurrentIndexes(fakeDb, onLog),
).resolves.toBeUndefined();
expect(execMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(CONCURRENT_INDEXES.length);
// The failure surfaced with an error argument for the caller to log.
expect(execMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(CONCURRENT_INDEXES.length + 1);
const errored = onLog.mock.calls.filter((c) => c[1] !== undefined);
expect(errored).toHaveLength(1);
expect(String(errored[0][1])).toContain('does not exist');
+70 -12
View File
@@ -11,12 +11,34 @@ import { Kysely, sql } from 'kysely';
* builds them out-of-band (no transaction) BEFORE the migrator runs; the matching
* migrations keep a plain `CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS` as a backstop, which then
* no-ops because the index already exists. So:
* - existing prod DB, incremental deploy: pre-build runs CONCURRENTLY (no write
* lock), migration's IF NOT EXISTS no-ops → the write-blocking build is gone;
* - fresh DB (or a DB that has not yet created `pages` / `f_unaccent`): the
* pre-build fails and is swallowed (best-effort), and the migration builds the
* index normally on an empty/small table where the lock is irrelevant.
* Worst case therefore equals the previous behaviour; best case removes the lock.
* - existing prod DB, incremental deploy: the pre-build FIRST redefines
* `f_unaccent` to its index-inlinable 1-arg form (see below), THEN builds each
* index CONCURRENTLY (no write lock); the migration's IF NOT EXISTS no-ops →
* the write-blocking build is gone;
* - fresh DB (or a DB whose `pages` / `unaccent` extension does not exist yet):
* the pre-build fails and is swallowed (best-effort), and the migration builds
* the index normally on an empty/small table where the lock is irrelevant.
*
* NOT a strict "worst case = previous behaviour":
* - The f_unaccent form matters. The trigram expressions use `LOWER(f_unaccent(col))`.
* The INDEX-INLINABLE 1-arg `f_unaccent(text)` (`SELECT public.unaccent($1)`)
* is created INSIDE migration 20260705, which runs AFTER this pre-build. On an
* existing tenant the live `f_unaccent` is still the OLD 2-arg form from
* 20250729, which Postgres CANNOT inline into a CONCURRENTLY index expression
* (`function unaccent(unknown, text) does not exist ... during inlining`) — the
* build fails outright. So this pre-build redefines `f_unaccent` to the 1-arg
* form FIRST (idempotent, output-identical, in lockstep with 20260705). Without
* that redefine the whole feature is dead-on-arrival for the very case it
* targets.
* - An INTERRUPTED `CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY` (killed pod, cancelled query) with
* a working `f_unaccent` leaves an INVALID index behind. A subsequent name-based
* `IF NOT EXISTS` — in BOTH this pre-build and the migration backstop — sees the
* name and skips, so the invalid index is NEVER repaired automatically and the
* query keeps seq-scanning until an operator `DROP INDEX`es it. The old
* in-transaction build could not leave an invalid index (a failed tx rolled the
* whole index back), so this is a genuinely new failure mode, not "= previous".
* (A future hardening could `DROP` an `indisvalid = false` index before
* rebuilding; not done here.)
*
* The `create` text is the CANONICAL definition — it MUST match the migration's
* `IF NOT EXISTS` create expression exactly (same functional expression + opclass)
@@ -49,6 +71,24 @@ export const CONCURRENT_INDEXES: ReadonlyArray<{
},
];
/**
* Idempotent, output-identical redefinition of `f_unaccent` to the INDEX-INLINABLE
* 1-arg form. MUST stay byte-for-byte in lockstep with migration
* `20260705T120000-perf-indexes.ts` (same signature + body): the trigram indexes
* above only build CONCURRENTLY once `f_unaccent(text)` inlines, and on an existing
* tenant it is still the old 2-arg form until that migration runs — which is AFTER
* this pre-build.
*/
const F_UNACCENT_REDEF = `
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f_unaccent(text)
RETURNS text
LANGUAGE sql
IMMUTABLE PARALLEL SAFE STRICT
AS $func$
SELECT public.unaccent($1);
$func$
`;
/**
* Best-effort, non-transactional pre-build of {@link CONCURRENT_INDEXES}. Run
* BEFORE the migrator so the blocking `CREATE INDEX` in the corresponding
@@ -57,23 +97,41 @@ export const CONCURRENT_INDEXES: ReadonlyArray<{
* `db` MUST be the top-level Kysely instance (NOT a transaction): each statement
* then executes on its own connection with no surrounding `BEGIN`, which is
* required for `CONCURRENTLY`. Every statement is independent and swallowed on
* error (a missing `pages`/`f_unaccent` on a fresh DB, an unsupported driver
* path, a permissions gap): the migration backstop still builds the index, so a
* failure here is never fatal. `onLog` reports progress/failures for the caller
* to route to its logger.
* error: the migration backstop still builds the index, so a failure here is
* never fatal. `onLog` reports progress/failures for the caller to route to its
* logger.
*
* ORDER MATTERS: redefine `f_unaccent` to the inlinable form BEFORE the index
* loop — otherwise an existing tenant's old 2-arg `f_unaccent` makes every
* CONCURRENTLY build fail and the feature is a no-op (see the module docstring).
*/
export async function ensureConcurrentIndexes(
db: Kysely<any>,
onLog?: (message: string, error?: unknown) => void,
): Promise<void> {
// Make f_unaccent inlinable FIRST. On a fresh DB (no `unaccent` extension yet)
// this throws harmlessly and is swallowed — the migration builds everything.
try {
await sql.raw(F_UNACCENT_REDEF).execute(db);
onLog?.('f_unaccent redefined to the index-inlinable 1-arg form');
} catch (error) {
onLog?.(
'f_unaccent redefine skipped (fresh DB / no unaccent extension) — ' +
'the migration will define it and build the indexes',
error,
);
}
for (const idx of CONCURRENT_INDEXES) {
try {
await sql.raw(idx.create).execute(db);
onLog?.(`Concurrent index ensured: ${idx.name}`);
} catch (error) {
// Non-fatal by design — the migration's IF NOT EXISTS create is the
// backstop. Common benign cause: the table/function does not exist yet on
// a fresh DB (the migrations will build the index instead).
// backstop. Benign on a fresh DB (the table/extension does not exist yet).
// NOT benign, but still swallowed, on an existing tenant whose f_unaccent
// could not be redefined above (then the migration builds the index NON-
// concurrently under the SHARE lock this feature meant to avoid).
onLog?.(
`Concurrent index pre-build skipped for ${idx.name} ` +
`(will fall back to the in-migration build)`,