Follow-up to the merged #166/#169. Addresses the second review pass (comment
1227):
- footnoteWarnings plumbing: extract a single `footnoteWarningsField(markdown)`
helper (footnote-analyze) and use it at all three call sites (create_page,
update_page, import_page_markdown) so the field is attached identically.
- New unit test footnote-warnings-import.test.mjs pins the contract that was
uncovered: the field is present on problems / omitted on clean input, and the
IMPORT path analyzes the BODY after the docmost:meta / docmost:comments blocks
(a footnote-like token inside those JSON blocks must NOT warn; a real body
marker must). Tested via the same pure composition the importer uses
(footnoteWarningsField(parseDocmostMarkdown(full).body)) — no collab socket
needed; a regression that analyzed fullMarkdown or skipped the body split would
now go red.
- footnote.marked.ts: correct the stale module header — it claimed "only
definitions that have a matching reference are emitted", which was never true
(orphan defs are emitted; the editor sync plugin reconciles). Now describes
first-wins + reuse + sync reconciliation.
- derive-id golden test: rename the describe from "(cross-package drift guard)"
to "(deterministic-scheme pin)" — there is no second package to drift against.
editor-ext 129, MCP 304 (+3), client+server tsc clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
0e8af13122