test(ai-chat): покрыть оркестраторы reconcile()/reconcileChat() (#487, F3)

Клаузы (a-d) тестировались по отдельности, но сам оркестратор reconcile()
(ПОРЯДОК клауз + пер-клаузная try/catch-изоляция «одна упавшая не блокирует
остальные») не проверялся, а reconcileChat() (старт каждого хода) не был
покрыт вовсе. Добавляю: тест порядка a→b→c→d; тест изоляции (клауза b кидает
— c и d всё равно отрабатывают, reconcile не реджектит); тест reconcileChat
(скоуп по чату, bound 50, failed→error / прочее→aborted).

MUTATION-VERIFY: снятие try/catch у клаузы (b) делает тест изоляции красным
(исключение пробрасывается, c+d пропускаются).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-11 07:49:30 +03:00
parent 9ba97b6d2b
commit 2cb07ef7fb
@@ -1929,3 +1929,148 @@ describe('AiChatService.stream — token-degeneration reaction (#444)', () => {
expect(patch.content).not.toContain(STEP_LIMIT_NO_ANSWER_MARKER);
});
});
// #487 F3 — the reconcile() / reconcileChat() ORCHESTRATORS. The individual
// clauses are exercised elsewhere; these pin the production orchestration the
// per-clause specs do not: the clause ORDER, the per-clause try/catch ISOLATION
// (one clause throwing must NOT abort the others), and reconcileChat() (which runs
// at the start of every turn and was entirely uncovered).
describe('AiChatService.reconcile / reconcileChat orchestrators (#487 F3)', () => {
let warnSpy: jest.SpyInstance;
beforeEach(() => {
// Silence the intentional clause-failure warnings (kept out of test output).
warnSpy = jest
.spyOn(Logger.prototype, 'warn')
.mockImplementation(() => undefined);
});
afterEach(() => {
warnSpy.mockRestore();
});
function makeService(opts: {
messageRepo?: Record<string, jest.Mock>;
runService?: Record<string, jest.Mock>;
}) {
const aiChatMessageRepo = {
findStreamingWithTerminalRun: jest.fn(async () => []),
stampTerminalIfStreaming: jest.fn(async () => undefined),
sweepStreamingWithoutActiveRun: jest.fn(async () => 0),
...(opts.messageRepo ?? {}),
};
const aiChatRunService = opts.runService
? {
zombieRunIds: jest.fn(() => []),
settleZombie: jest.fn(async () => true),
reconcileStaleRuns: jest.fn(async () => 0),
...opts.runService,
}
: undefined;
const svc = new AiChatService(
{} as never, // ai
{} as never, // aiChatRepo
aiChatMessageRepo as never,
{} as never, // aiChatPageSnapshotRepo
{} as never, // aiSettings
{} as never, // tools
{} as never, // mcpClients
{} as never, // aiAgentRoleRepo
{} as never, // pageRepo
{} as never, // pageAccess
{} as never, // environment
{} as never, // streamRegistry
aiChatRunService as never, // aiChatRunService (#487)
);
return { svc, aiChatMessageRepo, aiChatRunService };
}
it('reconcile() fires all four clauses IN ORDER (a -> b -> c -> d)', async () => {
const order: string[] = [];
const { svc } = makeService({
messageRepo: {
findStreamingWithTerminalRun: jest.fn(async () => {
order.push('b:find');
return [
{ messageId: 'm1', workspaceId: 'ws1', runStatus: 'succeeded' },
];
}),
stampTerminalIfStreaming: jest.fn(async () => {
order.push('b:stamp');
}),
sweepStreamingWithoutActiveRun: jest.fn(async () => {
order.push('d');
return 0;
}),
},
runService: {
zombieRunIds: jest.fn(() => ['z1']),
settleZombie: jest.fn(async () => {
order.push('a');
return true;
}),
reconcileStaleRuns: jest.fn(async () => {
order.push('c');
return 0;
}),
},
});
await svc.reconcile();
expect(order).toEqual(['a', 'b:find', 'b:stamp', 'c', 'd']);
});
it('a clause that THROWS does not abort the remaining clauses (per-clause try/catch isolation)', async () => {
const { svc, aiChatMessageRepo, aiChatRunService } = makeService({
messageRepo: {
// Clause (b) blows up mid-reconcile.
findStreamingWithTerminalRun: jest.fn(async () => {
throw new Error('clause b DB blip');
}),
},
runService: {
zombieRunIds: jest.fn(() => ['z1']),
},
});
// reconcile() must SETTLE (the clause-b failure is swallowed), not reject.
await expect(svc.reconcile()).resolves.toBeUndefined();
// (a) ran before (b); crucially (c) and (d) STILL ran despite (b) throwing —
// the property a missing try/catch would break. MUTATION-VERIFY: drop clause
// (b)'s try/catch and this reddens (the throw propagates, skipping c + d).
expect(aiChatRunService!.settleZombie).toHaveBeenCalled(); // (a)
expect(aiChatRunService!.reconcileStaleRuns).toHaveBeenCalled(); // (c)
expect(
aiChatMessageRepo.sweepStreamingWithoutActiveRun,
).toHaveBeenCalled(); // (d)
});
it('reconcileChat() settles THIS chat\'s stuck streaming rows by their run status', async () => {
const { svc, aiChatMessageRepo } = makeService({
messageRepo: {
findStreamingWithTerminalRun: jest.fn(async () => [
{ messageId: 'm1', workspaceId: 'ws1', runStatus: 'failed' },
{ messageId: 'm2', workspaceId: 'ws1', runStatus: 'succeeded' },
]),
},
});
await svc.reconcileChat('chat-1', 'ws1');
// Scoped to THIS chat and bounded at 50 (the user-facing opportunistic path).
expect(
aiChatMessageRepo.findStreamingWithTerminalRun,
).toHaveBeenCalledWith(50, { chatId: 'chat-1', workspaceId: 'ws1' });
// failed-run -> 'error'; every other terminal status -> 'aborted'.
expect(aiChatMessageRepo.stampTerminalIfStreaming).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'm1',
'ws1',
'error',
);
expect(aiChatMessageRepo.stampTerminalIfStreaming).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
'm2',
'ws1',
'aborted',
);
});
});